Same Sex Marriage–Apologetics 101

Apologetics 101

by John Martignoni  

(Marriage and the Eucharist, cont’d.) Finally, one other area where we can use these parallels between the sacraments of Marriage and the Eucharist to help us form an appropriate response, is this idea of same-sex “marriage”, so-called.  A very hot topic these days.  There is not now, never has been, and never will be, such a thing as a same-sex “marriage.”  It doesn’t matter how many judges issue how many licenses and how many wedding ceremonies take place – there will never be such a thing as a marriage between two men or two women.  God is the author of marriage.  He made it.  He defined it.  He joins the two together.  God has defined a marriage as something to unite one man and one woman.  Period.  

One man cannot marry another man and one woman cannot marry another.  Why?  The two cannot become one.  For the two to become one, there has to be a life-giving bridegroom and there has to be a life-receiving bride.  Between two men, there is no one to receive the life of the bridegroom.  Between two women, there is no bridegroom to give his life to the bride.   Consummation is not possible in either situation.  

A union, as such, between two men, would be as if Jesus wanted to give us His life in the Eucharist, but we had no way of receiving it.  It would be as if Jesus died on the Cross, but never
instituted the Eucharist.  A union, as such, between two women, would be as if we all wanted to receive the life-giving force of Christ in the Eucharist, but there was no life-giving force to receive.  It would be as if Jesus instituted the Eucharist, but then never died on the cross for us.  

There can be no such thing as a same-sex marriage, because there is no such thing as “life-giving” love, love that produces life, in a same-sex union.  Two men cannot produce a life between them.  Two women cannot produce a life between them.  It is a physical impossibility.  Therefore, same-sex “marriage” is an impossibility in the eyes of God.

St. Paul tells us in Romans, chapter 1, that the desire of a man for another man, or of a woman for another woman, is unnatural.  But you don’t have to believe in the Bible, or even in God, in order to understand that St. Paul was correct.  All you have to do is look at the body of a man and the body of a woman and you can easily discern that nature has designed a certain complementarity between the bodies of men and women.     

So, just from a simple observation, we can discern that nature designed a complementarity between the bodies of men and women.  We can discern that sex was designed by nature, to 1) be the physical union between a man and a woman, and 2) to perpetuate the survival of the species.  Same sex unions go against nature in both regards.  A man’s body was designed to join to a woman’s.  A woman’s body was designed to receive a man’s.  So, same-sex unions are contra nature.  They are inherently unnatural.  

And, if nature does indeed have a creator, then if same-sex unions are contrary to nature, it is safe to say that they are contrary to nature’s creator.  This is not about being “mean” to two people who are “in love” and it has nothing to do with “homophobia” or anything of the sort.  It actually is an act of charity to oppose what society is trying to impose.  If the Catholic Church is correct and homosexual acts are indeed acts of “grave depravity” and they are indeed “intrinsically disordered” (Catechism, #2357), then the most important thing to consider is the salvation of the souls of those committing these acts that are contrary to nature and contrary to nature’s God.

It is not mean, or somehow homophobic, or anything else of that nature to desire the good for a person and, particularly, to desire the ultimate good for a person – the salvation of someone’s soul.  The best thing a person can do if you know of someone who is struggling with same-sex attraction is to talk to them about God’s love for them…and to give them whatever support you can to help them live a chaste lifestyle.

And, it just so happens that the Diocese of Birmingham has recently seen the establishment of a chapter of Courage, which is an apostolate of the Catholic Church that ministers to persons with same-sex attraction (www.couragerc.org).  If you would like to find out more about the Courage chapter here in the Diocese of Birmingham, you can call the Courage chaplain at: 256-221-8844.  All calls are completely confidential.

Marriage and the Eucharist…the two shall become one.  I hope this series of articles has helped you to see and understand how intimately and intricately these two sacraments are linked together, and that they have helped you to look at marriage from a Eucharistic point of view, and to look at the Eucharist from a marital point of view.    

(Send any questions/comments to: jmartignoni@bhmdiocese.org.  If you would like to sign up for John’s free apologetics email newsletter, simply go to: www.biblechristiansociety.com.  You can also order his free CD’s on various apologetics topics at the website, including his CD that covers this topic which is entitled: “Marriage and the Eucharist: The Two Shall Become One.”)

Share on Facebook

Why Can’t Non-Catholics Receive Communion?

Apologetics 101

by John Martignoni  

(Marriage and the Eucharist, cont’d.) Why are non-Catholics not allowed to receive Communion in the Catholic Church?  It’s because receiving Communion in the Catholic Church, when you are not a member of the Catholic Church, when you have not committed yourself completely and totally to the Church, is like having sex outside of marriage.

A lot of folks reason that since sex is a gift from God – after all God gave us our sexual desires – then it can’t be wrong to use that gift and act on those desires.  It doesn’t matter if one is married or not.  Especially if it’s two consenting adults.  Well, we’ve shown that God’s way of doing things involves 3 steps: 1) Commitment, the man shall leave his mother and father, 2) Marriage, he shall cleave to his wife, and then 3) The two shall become one.  The physical consummation of the marriage is the sign that there is a lifelong commitment already in place.  It is the sign that these two people have given their very lives to each other.  It is the sign that God has joined these two people together.  

Sex outside of marriage is a lie.  You are speaking a lie with your  body.  You are saying I am committed to you for life with your body, when actually no such commitment exists.  It is a lie, a very serious lie.  You are lying to the person you are committing this act with.  And, even if you are “in love”, it is still a lie.  Why would you want to engage in a lie with someone you are supposedly in love with?  When you put step #3 – the two shall become one – before steps 1 or 2, you are messing with God’s plan for marriage.   And whenever you mess with God’s plan, something unpleasant will eventually result.  

Sex outside of marriage is getting things out of order.  There is no lifelong commitment in place, therefore the sign of that commitment, physical intimacy, should not take place.  To be sexually active outside of marriage is to be consummating a commitment that does not exist.  It is engaging in a lie.

Drawing the parallel, a lot of non-Catholics believe that they should have the right to receive the Eucharist in our Church. They even get offended when they are told that they can’t.    A lot of Catholics believe it’s no big deal if non-Catholics receive the Eucharist.  But allowing non-Catholics to receive the Eucharist is, again, tantamount to approving of sex outside of marriage.  If a person is not a Catholic, then that means that they are not fully united to the Church.  They have not made a total  commitment to the Church. The Eucharist is the sign and source of unity among Christians, and particularly so for Catholic Christians.  It is the sign that the two have become one, and that the many have become one.  If someone is not a Catholic, even though they may believe what Catholics believe about the Eucharist actually being the Body and Blood of Christ, they cannot receive Communion.  They are not fully united to the Church, no lifelong commitment has been made.  No commitment…no consummation…no Eucharist!  

When we receive the Eucharist, we are saying, with our bodies, that we believe what the Catholic Church teaches…in its entirety.  We are saying we believe not only what the Church teaches on the Eucharist, but we are also saying that we believe what it teaches on the priesthood, on the Communion of Saints, on the Sacraments, on Mary, on the Mass, and on and on.  If someone who is not Catholic receives Communion, then they are saying to us, with their bodies, that they believe all that Catholics believe.  That they have made a commitment and they are consummating that commitment.  But, they don’t believe as we do!  And they haven’t made that commitment!  That’s why they’re not Catholic.

Therefore, for them to receive the Eucharist, would be a lie.  They would be lying with their bodies before God and before man.  Just as those who engage in sexual relations outside of marriage are lying with their bodies to each other and to God.  So, if anyone ever asks you why Catholics do not allow non-Catholics to receive Communion, you can simply say that it’s because we don’t believe in sex outside of marriage.  That is why we do not allow non-Catholics to receive Communion in the Catholic Church…we do not want them to engage in a lie.      

And that is why we, as Catholics, cannot receive Communion in Protestant churches.  We would be saying, with our bodies, that we believe as they believe.  But we don’t, so it would be a lie before man and God to receive Communion, or the Lord’s Supper, in a Protestant church.  

So, again, if anyone ever asks you why non-Catholics cannot receive Communion in the Catholic Church, simply ask them if they are in communion with the Catholic Church.  Ask them if they believe all that the Church teaches, on everything, not just on the Eucharist.  If they say no, ask them why it is they want to receive Communion in the Church when they are not actually in communion with the Church?  Ask them why they want to receive the sign of unity, when there is no unity?  Make it clear to them that the act of receiving Communion in our Church is a declaration that they believe as we believe.  And, if they don’t believe as we believe, then, should they receive the Eucharist, they are committing a lie with their bodies and it would be an egregious offense against the Church and against God.  Tell them it is just like sex outside of marriage.  They want the consummation before they’ve made the commitment.

Next week: Same-sex “marriage”…

(Send any questions/comments to: jmartignoni@bhmdiocese.org.  If you would like to sign up for John’s free apologetics email newsletter, simply go to: www.biblechristiansociety.com.  You can also order his free CD’s on various apologetics topics at the website, including his CD that covers this topic which is entitled: “Marriage and the Eucharist: The Two Shall Become One.”)

Share on Facebook

Pro-creative love… – Apologetics 101

Apologetics 101

by John Martignoni

To continue with our parallels between Marriage and the Eucharist, when we receive the Eucharist, when we receive Christ into our bodies, we are receiving the very life of Christ within us.  Galatians 4:19, “My little children, with whom I am again in travail until Christ be formed in you.”  Christ be formed in you.  Through the Eucharist, Jesus is planting the seeds of life – His life – within us.

When a wife receives her husband in the marital embrace, she is receiving his very life within her.  He is planting the seeds of life within her.  Through contraception, the life-giving aspect of that act is held back.  What if Jesus held back the life-giving aspect of the Eucharist from us?  What if Jesus decided not to give Himself fully to us?  What if Jesus prevented us from receiving life in the Eucharist.  What if Jesus prevented us from having His life conceived within us through our reception of the Eucharist?  What if Jesus, in a spiritual sense, contracepted?  Could anyone ever consider that to be a good thing?

And what exactly is it that we are holding back from our spouse through contraception?  Is it just one little aspect of who and what we are as human beings?  Could you say, “Well, I’m not going to share this one aspect of me with my spouse, but I’m willing to share all the hundreds and hundreds of other aspects of myself with my spouse.  In other words, I’m willing to share 99.9%, but just not 100%.”  I don’t think so.

Listen to this passage from Genesis, chapter 1, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.”  And in Genesis 5 it says, “When Adam had lived a hundred and thirty years, he became the father of a son in his own likeness, after his image.”  God created man in His image and likeness.  Man participates in this act of creation to produce children in his image and likeness.  Scripture tells us that man is doing something God-like in the act of physical generation.  The act of creating life, is, in my opinion, where man most closely imitates God and most closely cooperates with God.  The act of creating life is where man mirrors God most closely.  Think about it.  God and man, working together to bring new life into the world!  A new body with a new, eternal soul, into this world.  Is this just .1% or some other small percent of who we are?  Is the aspect of our humanity where we participate in the act of creation with God Himself, is that aspect of our humanity just one aspect among hundreds of others?

No!  When we contracept, when we do not share ourselves fully and completely and openly and without reserve with our spouse, we are not sharing with our spouse one of the two major aspects of who we are as human beings that may be end up destroying your relationship with that you need a counsel here.  We were created to love and to give life.  That is what the marriage act is all about…giving love and creating life.  To withhold either love or life from our spouse, is to withhold a major aspect of who we are as human beings.

God is love.  And because He is love, He gives life.  His love is procreative…pro-creative.  His love gives life.  When we separate love from life, as when we do when we use contraception, then our love is no longer like God’s love.  It is not pro-creative love.  It is anti-creative love.  It is selfish love.  And when we separate love from life, when our love is no longer pro-creative, but anti-creative, selfish love, we start experiencing serious consequences – not just as individuals, or as married couples, but as a society.  Just look all around you at the hell that has been created by the separation of love and life…astronomical divorce rates, abortion, out-of-wedlock births, test tube babies, human cloning, pornography, homosexual marriage, AIDS and other sexually-transmitted diseases, and on and on it goes.

When we receive the Eucharist, when we receive Christ into our bodies, we are receiving the very life of Christ within us.  Again, He is planting the seeds of life within us.  When a wife receives her husband, she is receiving his very life within her.  He is planting the seeds of life within her.  Again, what if Jesus decided to contracept in a spiritual sense?  What if Jesus held back the life-giving aspect of the Eucharist from us?  What if Jesus decided not to give Himself fully to us?   What if Jesus held back the very aspect of the Eucharist that the Eucharist was designed to convey…Life!?

That’s what we do when we contracept.  We hold back the life-giving aspect of the marital embrace – the very aspect that the marital embrace was designed, by God, to convey.  Can that ever be a good thing?  God put the two aspects, love and life, together in the physical union between husband and wife.  When we contracept, we are separating what God has put together.  We are separating love from life.  And doesn’t Scripture say, let no man rend asunder what God has joined together?
Next week: Why non-Catholics cannot receive Communion in the Catholic Church…

(Send any questions/comments to: jmartignoni@bhmdiocese.org.  If you would like to sign up for John’s free apologetics email newsletter, simply go to: www.biblechristiansociety.com.  You can also order his free CD’s on various apologetics topics at the website, including his CD that covers this topic which is entitled: “Marriage and the Eucharist: The Two Shall Become One.”)

Share on Facebook

Marriage and the Eucharist – Apologetics 101

Apologetics 101

by John Martignoni

Marriage and the Eucharist.  We ended last week with John 6:54, “He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life.”  The Eucharist is all about giving us life…eternal life.  By receiving the Eucharist into our bodies we are receiving God’s own life into ourselves.  We are receiving Life itself.

Listen to what Paul says in Galatians 4:19, “My little children, with whom I am again in travail until Christ be formed in you.”  We need to have Christ formed within us.  Christ, through the Eucharist, is giving us His very life.  Christ, through the Eucharist, is planting the seeds of eternal life in our bodies.  Seeds that will hopefully grow, aided by the Holy Spirit, until Christ is fully formed within us.  Through the Eucharist, through receiving Christ into our bodies, the two have become one.

In the marital embrace, the wife receives her husband’s love and his very life within her. And he is planting the seeds of life that could very well grow until a life is fully formed within her.  The two, husband and wife, have become one.  And the two becoming one is most readily apparent when the marital embrace results in the conception of a new life.  The two have become one have become three.  It is here, in the life-giving and love-giving act of marital intimacy, that the family of man most closely mirrors the family of God…the Trinity.

Can you see how the Sacrament of Marriage is inextricably linked to the Sacrament of the Eucharist?  How God’s relationship to us is most clearly mirrored in the relationship of husband and wife?  How the Holy Spirit proceeds from the life-giving and love-giving relationship between  the Father and the Son, just as a child proceeds from the life-giving and love-giving relationship between husband and wife?  In the Eucharist, the Holy Spirit in a sense “overshadows” us and we receive Jesus into our bodies.  The Annunciation, was, in some ways, a pre-figuring of the Eucharist.  The Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary and the two became one became three but sometimes even the greatest marriages have trouble, so getting help is important to keep the foundation of marriage intact, there are even Christian counseling that you can find at sites like the Ranch of Hope that help you with this.

The Bible starts off, in Genesis 2:24, with marriage.  All through the Bible, Old Testament and New, the relationship between God and Israel, and then between God and the Church, is described in marital terms.  And then, in the Book of Revelation, at the end of the Bible, at the end of time, we have the eternal Wedding Feast of the Lamb…the eternal union between Christ and His Bride, the Church, in the New Jerusalem.

Do we approach the Eucharist within a marital framework?  Do we see it as the very intimate act that it is?  Do we allow ourselves to be completely open to receiving Jesus…to receiving His love…to receiving His life?  Do we keep in mind His total self-giving…His being poured out on the cross for us, whenever we receive Christ in the Eucharist?  Are WE offering ourselves totally and completely to Him?  Are we pouring ourselves out for Him?  Are we allowing Him to change our lives?  Are we allowing Him to plant the seeds of eternal life within us?  Are we allowing Jesus to be formed within us?  Or, do we allow the receiving of the Eucharist to become routine?  Just one action of many that we participate in at the Mass?  Do you mentally tell yourself, “Okay, Father’s holding up the host, we’ll be out of here in 15 minutes.”?

Do we approach relations, and particularly our physical relations, with our spouse within a Eucharistic framework?  Do we realize that whenever we “know” our spouse, that we are re-presenting ourselves fully and totally to him or her?  That we are back on our wedding day and are re-presenting ourselves before God?  That we are participating in an act of love that gives life, and that this act is a sign of the life-giving love that God gives to us?  Do we contemplate these things?  Do we raise physical intimacy with our spouse to a sacramental level, instead of a mere physical act?

Now, having drawn some of these parallels, let me ask the question: What if Jesus did not give all of Himself to us?  What if Jesus held back the life-giving aspect of the Eucharist?  In other words, what if we received His body and blood, but Jesus then did something to prevent that Body and Blood from producing life within us?  We received the Body and Blood, but it was somehow prevented from forming Jesus within us?  I think you may have an idea where I’m going here.

The question of contraception.  Society says, no big deal.  Most Catholics say, no big deal.  But, looking at the marital embrace within a Eucharistic framework, do you maybe see now why it is such a big deal?  When a man and a woman use contraception, then the man is saying to the woman, “I am giving myself to you, but I am not giving myself completely and totally and without reservation.  I am holding something back.  I do not wish to share the life-giving aspects of this act with you.  I do not want the two to become one”  Or, the wife is saying, “I do not want to receive all of you with no exceptions.  I do not wish to receive you completely and totally and without reservation.  I do not wish to receive the life-giving aspects of this act from you.  I do not want the two to become one.”
Next week: Pro-creative love…

(Send any questions/comments to: jmartignoni@bhmdiocese.org.  If you would like to sign up for John’s free apologetics email newsletter, simply go to: www.biblechristiansociety.com.  You can also order his free CD’s on various apologetics topics at the website, including his CD that covers this topic which is entitled: “Marriage and the Eucharist: The Two Shall Become One.”)

Share on Facebook

6th Annual Tulsa March for Life – Updated

Tomorrow Night – The 6th Annual March for Life featuring Rebecca Hamilton

March For Life 2015

Christianity started making waves, basically the Emperor’s New Clothes, and pointed out that there is no other God but the One True God. They refused to accept Roman gods or even acknowledge the divinity of Caesar. Sound familiar?

> Once again, the media all but ignored hundreds, maybe even well over a thousand, citizens marching in the streets to “Protest Abortion”. We weren’t protesting, we were demonstrating, we were challenging. Channel 8, KTUL, said there were “150” marching and cut to extensive coverage of a Planned Parenthood celebration of a “Woman’s Right to Choose” and talked about “a woman’s reproductive rights.”

Christians, once again, are being told that we can have our ‘god’ as long as we accept the gods of others. We may follow the teachings of our Sacred Scripture as long as we acknowledge that the Bible is one book among many, just a history book that must ‘change with the times’. Like the early Christians, we must be firm in our faith and in the knowledge that all religions are not the same and there is One Savior who washed our sins away in his own blood.

We must, we absolutely MUST, acknowledge life as separate and definite. A child is NOT a woman’s body, it is a distinct life form that will develop an independent consciousness. If a child were just a part of the woman’s body, it would not be expelled after a specific period of time to function relatively independently. A child outside the womb remains dependent upon the parents. A child inside the woman has its own circulation and can even have differing blood types from the mother.

No, the child deserves our protection. If we choose not to protect the child in the womb, what prevents us from withholding protection to the battered woman, the abused child, the murdered innocent?

Share on Facebook

Tolerance?

Prior to the advent of Christianity, there was no real opposition from the Roman government toward foreign religions. In fact, the Roman Empire embraced new gods. Rome even built the Pantheon as a Temple for All gods, even those they didn’t know about.

Christianity came along, however, and would not play by Rome’s society rules of “Tolerance”. Rome didn’t have a problem with a religion as long as it’s citizens acknowledged that all the gods were the same, even accepted other gods. Christianity started making waves, basically the Emperor’s New Clothes, and pointed out that there is no other God but the One True God. They refused to accept Roman gods or even acknowledge the divinity of Caesar.  Sound familiar? Christians, once again, are being told that we can have our ‘god’ as long as we accept the gods of others. We may follow the teachings of our Sacred Scripture as long as we acknowledge that the Bible is one book among many, just a history book that must ‘change with the times’. Like the early Christians, we must be firm in our faith and in the knowledge that all religions are not the same and there is One Savior who washed our sins away in his own blood.

Peace and Prayers

Share on Facebook

Thoughts on the 6th Annual March for Life

Eternal God, in whom mercy is endless and the treasury of compassion — inexhaustible, look kindly upon us and increase Your mercy in us, that in difficult moments we might not despair nor become despondent, but with great confidence submit ourselves to Your holy will, which is Love and Mercy itself.
Amen

In front of Holy Family Cathedral, the March for Life began.
In front of Holy Family Cathedral, the March for Life began.

Sometimes it just doesn’t look like we can make any kind of difference and nothing we can do will have merit. In these times, when looking at the incredible multitude of murdered children through abortion, when our words are twisted in such a way the it seems that, if we love children, if we support life, we are portrayed as “haters of women” or “denying women’s rights to ‘choose'”. It is during these times, when it looks bleak, that we should look to our Creator for His Divine Mercy to not despair but have confidence in His Holy Will.

The Tulsa March for Life is next Thursday. Please make it a point to join a cross section of our communities, from churches in Claremore, Anglicans from Broken Arrow, Lutherans, Tulsa Bible Church, Victory Christian Center, Catholics, and women and children, men and sons from all walks of life. Each of them, my own friends and family, anyone, can make a difference with our actions. Invite a friend.

This is not a protest, it is a challenge. It is not a parade, it is a demonstration and a prayer. This is NOT a “Catholic” thing, it is a “People thing”. This is about honoring the lost lives of over 55 MILLION children who never were given the choice to live, have children, have families – more than half of whom would have been sisters, daughters, mothers and grandmothers! This is not about discrimination toward women, but about giving a voice to women who, otherwise, are defenseless in the face of abortion.

Share on Facebook

Merry Christmas from our Family to yours

This year has been a year of highs and lows, at the beginning of the year, Linda was struck by tragedy with the loss of her two sisters in the span of 8 days. Through faith, friendship, and support she has struggled through. There is a silence in our home which can be deafening at times, Chi Chi is a constant reminder of Judy, and memories abound. Tragic though it was, the blessings overshadow the pain of loss.

From that loss, I began working on tracing the many steps of Linda and my families. As the numbers and connections grow, I have found connections to over 1600 families and almost 2500 individuals that are ancestors and cousins. I have found connections to the Lawrence, Dennington, Casdorph, McGrew, Arroyo, Rivera, Marin, Likes, Ferran, Fowler, Blount and so many more.

I have found Pedro Rivera de Rivera, husband of Maria and parents of my abuela, Aurea Rivera Arroyo. I discovered aunts of my father that died at young ages, I found my Grandma McGrew’s mother and father, her grandparents and great grandparents. I have traced my Grandpa McGrew’s family all the way back to the Revolutionary War! Linda’s mother’s grandparents raised Barbara and her sister Betty Blount. The Venable’s, Joe and Effie, struggled through the Depression. Joe Venable and Isaac Fowler both were registered for the Draft for World War I.

I have had an opportunity to continue working with the Seminarians of the Tulsa Diocese through the Knights of Columbus. This year Linda and I hosted the Bishop, several priests and seminarians for a fund raiser at our home. This was a kick off of a campaign to help to shore up the Seminarians’ Trust Fund and meet a Challenge Grant from the Catholic Extension Society. By the end of this year, we were able to raise the $100,000 necessary to receive the matching $50,000 for a total of $150,000.00! From a personal perspective, this was a challenge that I never imagined being a part of or instrumental in being able to achieve our goals. It is a demonstration to me of the power of the Holy Spirit in guiding our steps.

Just a few days ago, Jose’ welcomed a new son into the world, Bryce Anthony Arroyo. Another life, another chance. Jose’ has made great strides in the past year and will soon settle down in marriage to Kacy Keifer. God Bless them both.

God Bless you this Christmas season. During the Octave that follows, count your blessings and pray for the courage to always follow HIS will!

 

J.A. and Linda Arroyo

Share on Facebook

Ponderings at the end of the year and Ice Storm Anniversary

On December 11th, 2007, an Ice Storm all but devastated the Tulsa area. Trees were torn apart, leaving scars on trees across the city that took years to heal and, even 7 years later, can still be seen. To this day, trees show the scars of this storm.

To be fair, it has been brought to my attention that this photo is a photo taken by Mr. Ben Nelson – BenNelsonPics.com. That was taken in Springfield, Missouri. Somehow, this photo made it into my collection from this storm, I apologize profusely for not providing credit before. Credit for art should always go where it is due.

 

 

Mother, during this time, was taken to the hospital and was taking her last breaths at Hillcrest. Appropriately, as all the lights were extinguished across the Tulsa Metro area, so too the light from Shirley Beio was also extinguished. Eternal Rest grant unto her, O’ Lord…

Share on Facebook

Happy and Safe Halloween

Happy Halloween
Share on Facebook